V batches

[Jeff73]

Hi,

Is there an easy way to have the voucher match program create V batches that are already Approved, so that nobody has to go thru the "hassle" of putting A's next to each and every one? I checked processing options of P4314 and AP functional server and P04105 and others, but nothing seemed to do the trick...

Thanks,
J.

 

[blittle]

Try your AP Constants

 

[Jeff73]

That I hadn't tried

Thanks,

J.

 

[Jeff73]

is it possible to have that for specific companies, not all of them?

 

[ian_morton99]

A/P constants are not company specific.



Ian Morton
Peregrine Group, Inc.





----Original Message Follows----
From: Jeff73 <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: V batches
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:09:03 -0800 (PST)

is it possible to have that for specific companies, not all of them?
A7.3 Cume 11
--------------------------
To view this thread, go to:
http://www.jdelist.com/ubb/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=W&Number=51244
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
This is the JDEList World™ mailing list/forum.
Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
UNSUBSCRIBE can be found on the JDEList Forum at
http://www.JDEList.com

JDEList is not affiliated with JDEdwards®

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Ian Morton
Peregrine Group, Inc.

 

[blittle]

No, it's all or none.

 

[Jeff73]

Thanks, B.

What I've done - at least in test env. - is that I created a new F0009 with that flag turned on that I want to attach to a library list that'll be called for by the group of userids I want...

Do you see that working or are there any problems I should be aware of?

Thanks,
J.

 

[bruce_meyer]

Jeff, the only issue that I would see is if other changes to the constants
are done, they would have to be changed in the F0009 in the other library as
well. This may or may not be an issue for you.

An alternative may be to create a WW that, based on the user(s), would
update the batch header for the 'V' batch to be approved rather than
pending.