SSAJAROFF
Reputable Poster
RE: UBE on server Vs Workstation
Yathindra :
Although I'm not an AS/400 expert, I've seen that OneWorld UBEs seem to run
more efficiently
on NT/Unix than on AS/400 (this happens since B732x but I don't know why)
I've seen a bunch of AS/400 customers adopting a three server solution :
AS/400 as a
database server, NT as UBE server and their NT Deployment with SQL Central
Objects.
As a matter of fact, server packages are built faster when Central Objects
reside on the
NT/SQL Deployment than Central Objects residing on the AS/400! It's hard to
believe!
Of course, don't forget to read KG tuning papers.
You will find many documents that explain how to enhance OneWorld
performance on any platform.
Yours, Sebastian Sajaroff
B7321 to Xe, NT, SQL, Citrix, JAS, Interoperability.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1>Edited by ekempter on 3/8/01 09:30 AM.</FONT></P>
Yathindra :
Although I'm not an AS/400 expert, I've seen that OneWorld UBEs seem to run
more efficiently
on NT/Unix than on AS/400 (this happens since B732x but I don't know why)
I've seen a bunch of AS/400 customers adopting a three server solution :
AS/400 as a
database server, NT as UBE server and their NT Deployment with SQL Central
Objects.
As a matter of fact, server packages are built faster when Central Objects
reside on the
NT/SQL Deployment than Central Objects residing on the AS/400! It's hard to
believe!
Of course, don't forget to read KG tuning papers.
You will find many documents that explain how to enhance OneWorld
performance on any platform.
Yours, Sebastian Sajaroff
B7321 to Xe, NT, SQL, Citrix, JAS, Interoperability.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1>Edited by ekempter on 3/8/01 09:30 AM.</FONT></P>