kipkingle
Active Member
I was wondering if any CNC migration experts could help me with a quick little best practice tip? A developer that I work with would like to obsolete an object. (Not delete it.) Typically, if you create an object and do not have any further use for it, you just delete the object and promote it up the food chain. In this case though, the user wants the unused object to be available so they can view or copy it, but they don’t want this object to be moved over in the next upgrade. I was trying to come up with the best approach to fit this need, but I’m not that familiar what flags are used during the pathcode migration. One approach that I though of was to update the Omit Option (OL9.F9860.OMIT) flag to an “X” on the object itself and tell our CNC migrators to ignore those objects when we move to 8.12. Do you think this is a good idea? Can the migration applications support exclusions?
Thanks..
Thanks..