i_stevens
Member
Hi all
We are currently running OneWorld B733.2 and World Cum 11 on an AS/400. We have reached 80% disk usage on our AS/400. In reviewing where this is used, we found two files in our data library (A73PRDDTA) that are 7GB (F0911R) and 5GB (F83UI001) in size. We have noticed that both files have a large number of deleted records. Both files appear to be workfiles, F0911R for the reconciliations on F0911, and F83UI001 for the drill-down from financial reports.
I have some questions that I would like help with:
1. is running RGZPFM (Reorganise physical file member) recommended/supported by JDE?
2. will running this command improve performance?
3. should we set these files to REUSEDLT(*YES), and is this recommended/supported by JDE?
4. can we do the same to other JDE files?
5. are there any restrictions on using these commands with JDE running on the AS/400?
By running the RGZPFM over these two files in each of our data libraries, we expect to recover over 20% of disk space.
We could recover even more disk space by running the RGZPFM over other files on the system, but are concerned about impacts this may have.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ian
We are currently running OneWorld B733.2 and World Cum 11 on an AS/400. We have reached 80% disk usage on our AS/400. In reviewing where this is used, we found two files in our data library (A73PRDDTA) that are 7GB (F0911R) and 5GB (F83UI001) in size. We have noticed that both files have a large number of deleted records. Both files appear to be workfiles, F0911R for the reconciliations on F0911, and F83UI001 for the drill-down from financial reports.
I have some questions that I would like help with:
1. is running RGZPFM (Reorganise physical file member) recommended/supported by JDE?
2. will running this command improve performance?
3. should we set these files to REUSEDLT(*YES), and is this recommended/supported by JDE?
4. can we do the same to other JDE files?
5. are there any restrictions on using these commands with JDE running on the AS/400?
By running the RGZPFM over these two files in each of our data libraries, we expect to recover over 20% of disk space.
We could recover even more disk space by running the RGZPFM over other files on the system, but are concerned about impacts this may have.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ian