Diana_Maas
Active Member
Re: FRW creating =?iso-8859-1?Q?JE=B4s?=
Since you are using a financial reporting tool that creates any output
(print) line at a 'break' it has already loaded into the BC the
values of the 'new record' (the record that caused the level break to
occur). So, if you are using a BC value to define the MCUS it
would indeed be the MCUS for the record that was just loaded.
Hope that is helpful.
-
Diana L. Maas
URS Corporation
Information Technology
P.O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1080
512.419.6407
[email protected]
| | GerClaassen |
| | <g.claassen@getro|
| | nics.nl> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-jdeowdev@jd|
| | elist.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/04/2003 11:48 |
| | AM |
| | Please respond to|
| | jdeowdev |
| | |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: [email protected] |
| cc: |
| Subject: FRW creating JE´s |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
We have a problem with financial reports, creating JE´s.
At the moment we are implementing Oneworld XE and uptil now World-software
is used.
We are now developing financial reports in OW, based on the
FASTR-definitions.
A functionality which is very often used, is the creation of journal
entries.
In Financial Report Writer, we use the smart field FINRPTJE and in the
definition of this smart field we define that the 'subsequent business
unit" ( on tab JE report result BU) should be retreived as part of the
account number in the JE. (with definition *S)
When running the report, there are indeed JE's created, however, with the
wrong MCU in the account number.
Our definition of the "subsequent business unit" is that the value of the
field MCUS in F0006 should be retrieved from the BSVW Business Unit.
This is also how FASTR in World-software functions.
However, the interpretation of "subsequent business unit"of JDE in OW is
different and in our opinion wrong.
As also de!
scribed in KG document OFN-02-0077, the 'subsequent business unit" is
retrieved from the next record read in the report.
This makes no sense at all.
Has anyone encountered the same issue; strange enough we cannot find any
issues on JDE´s KG.[
--------------------------
To view this thread, go to:
http://www.jdelist.com/ubb/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=OWDEV&Number=56092
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
This is the JDEList One World® / XE Developers mailing list/forum.
Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
UNSUBSCRIBE can be found on the JDEList Forum at
http://www.JDEList.com
JDEList is not affiliated with JDEdwards®
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
Since you are using a financial reporting tool that creates any output
(print) line at a 'break' it has already loaded into the BC the
values of the 'new record' (the record that caused the level break to
occur). So, if you are using a BC value to define the MCUS it
would indeed be the MCUS for the record that was just loaded.
Hope that is helpful.
-
Diana L. Maas
URS Corporation
Information Technology
P.O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1080
512.419.6407
[email protected]
| | GerClaassen |
| | <g.claassen@getro|
| | nics.nl> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-jdeowdev@jd|
| | elist.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/04/2003 11:48 |
| | AM |
| | Please respond to|
| | jdeowdev |
| | |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: [email protected] |
| cc: |
| Subject: FRW creating JE´s |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
We have a problem with financial reports, creating JE´s.
At the moment we are implementing Oneworld XE and uptil now World-software
is used.
We are now developing financial reports in OW, based on the
FASTR-definitions.
A functionality which is very often used, is the creation of journal
entries.
In Financial Report Writer, we use the smart field FINRPTJE and in the
definition of this smart field we define that the 'subsequent business
unit" ( on tab JE report result BU) should be retreived as part of the
account number in the JE. (with definition *S)
When running the report, there are indeed JE's created, however, with the
wrong MCU in the account number.
Our definition of the "subsequent business unit" is that the value of the
field MCUS in F0006 should be retrieved from the BSVW Business Unit.
This is also how FASTR in World-software functions.
However, the interpretation of "subsequent business unit"of JDE in OW is
different and in our opinion wrong.
As also de!
scribed in KG document OFN-02-0077, the 'subsequent business unit" is
retrieved from the next record read in the report.
This makes no sense at all.
Has anyone encountered the same issue; strange enough we cannot find any
issues on JDE´s KG.[
--------------------------
To view this thread, go to:
http://www.jdelist.com/ubb/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=OWDEV&Number=56092
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
This is the JDEList One World® / XE Developers mailing list/forum.
Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
UNSUBSCRIBE can be found on the JDEList Forum at
http://www.JDEList.com
JDEList is not affiliated with JDEdwards®
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
