Hello! Thank you! YES! YES! YES!
3 weeks ago we were the only ones that had reported this issue and now it
seems that more and more are coming out of the wood work. We're having
this issue with LOTS of UBEs and the problem seems to be spreading.
It appears that when submitting various UBE's to the server neither the
Processing options nor the Data Selection information is getting to the
server. We've run DEBUG on both Server and Local runs and on the server
the jobs provides the wrong results and the DEBUG logs shows that the SQL
statement is incorrect (ie. Var = ' ') or that a BSFN Call
(JDB_SetSelectionX) has failed whereas the Local run gives the correct
results and the Local DEBUG log shows the correct SQL statement (ie. Var
= 'data') or that a BSFN Call (JDB_SetSelectionX) has succeeded.
We've done extensive testing in this area and JDE has pulled a lot of
people on this issue but so far we have had no success pinning down the
ultimate cause. Our findings are based on observation and does not seem
to be environemnt specific. Some UBE's do not run in PY but do in DV, JD
and PD. Others do not run in DV or PY but do in JD and PD.
If anyone has this issue I think JDE needs to be made aware of it. There's
power in numbers and the more examples we have the better chance we have of
finding a common thread. Please report your issues to JDE Help Desk.
So far we have identified the following UBE's:
R03B707
R04413
R04570
R09321
R09410
R09420
R09706
R09801
R09813
R10211B
R43510
If we can find a common, BSFN, ER, DLL, etc. then maybe we can find a cure
faster.
Regards,
Gerald
tet_hadavas
<tet.hadavas@suppl To:
[email protected]
ycore.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Running UBE Locally vs. Server
owner-jdelistml@jd
elist.com
08/13/2001 04:15
PM
Please respond to
jdelist
Dear List,
I encountered something strange. I made a copy of a version of R43530 and
modified it. It ran the way I wanted on my workstation. So I built an
update package and deployed it to the Enterprise Server. When I ran this
UBE through the server, a couple key information (e.g. the buyer and phone
numbers) were missing. Has anyone seen this before? Any help will be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Tet
OneWorld Xe, SP15, Windows 2000, SQL 7.0
--------------------------