Jaise James
Reputable Poster
All,
I am little confused about separating F986110. In past I had it separated by servers. In 9.1 I have it configured to go to same table. This works fine. However it shows non-production jobs in production. Its little annoying. So I create couple of different tables ( F986110/11/12/13/14/14A) with different own and created a new datasource. Created OCM to point to right place.However, its not working. Basically, as if its not reading the OCM mapping as all.
Speaking to Oracle they say this is not supported. I am quite surprised as well as confused to hear that. They are trying to check in internal document on this. I thought this was a basic functionality. I know I can enable Row security on EXEhost column in F986110 to segregate this, But I would rather not go that route Has any one configured this in 9.1 .
I am little confused about separating F986110. In past I had it separated by servers. In 9.1 I have it configured to go to same table. This works fine. However it shows non-production jobs in production. Its little annoying. So I create couple of different tables ( F986110/11/12/13/14/14A) with different own and created a new datasource. Created OCM to point to right place.However, its not working. Basically, as if its not reading the OCM mapping as all.
Speaking to Oracle they say this is not supported. I am quite surprised as well as confused to hear that. They are trying to check in internal document on this. I thought this was a basic functionality. I know I can enable Row security on EXEhost column in F986110 to segregate this, But I would rather not go that route Has any one configured this in 9.1 .