DJH
Active Member
Hi everybody
My Post is regarding CFR Auditing... I have set this up a few times previously only 9.2 systems and I have never had any issues using Multiple Pathcodes. I have never before separated the system config tables.
I am about to do this again on 2 systems, both 9.2 Tools Release with 9.2 Apps.
I see the recommended approach in the documentation is to split the config and use different 'A' Table names per pathcode. I am now thinking whether I need to use this approach or not, and I would like to get other peoples opinions on whether it is needed or not? Other CNCs I have spoken to have also never split the tables per pathcode and have never had an issue.
The systems in question are both OCI, with Oracle 12C DB, using TR9.2.2.4, on Apps 9.2 Update 2.
Thanks in advance for any replies
My Post is regarding CFR Auditing... I have set this up a few times previously only 9.2 systems and I have never had any issues using Multiple Pathcodes. I have never before separated the system config tables.
I am about to do this again on 2 systems, both 9.2 Tools Release with 9.2 Apps.
I see the recommended approach in the documentation is to split the config and use different 'A' Table names per pathcode. I am now thinking whether I need to use this approach or not, and I would like to get other peoples opinions on whether it is needed or not? Other CNCs I have spoken to have also never split the tables per pathcode and have never had an issue.
The systems in question are both OCI, with Oracle 12C DB, using TR9.2.2.4, on Apps 9.2 Update 2.
Thanks in advance for any replies