Re-applying custom mods after UPDATE2/ESUs on UBE

Hi List/Forum,

I will detail my current situation but I suppose it is not special for the UBE/UPDATE2/ESUs but could be general problem.
I really-really hope that somebody could help because this issue drives me crazy. Let's see.

First of all: this happens on XE SP 15.1, SQL+NTs

1.) I made more mods on R12855 User Defined Depreciation UBE, like:
* extended the layout of an existing section
* created three custom section (all are Conditional, hmmm... alias "Page Break After" on our SP15.1, see the thread: Do Custom Section)
* added event rule parts to existing event rules of existing sections (as less as was necessary)
* added event rules to my new sections (all in Do Section)

2.) We applied UPDATE2 and some ESUs
* Although our CNC guys said it happened with MERGE, all of my mods were wiped out (no problem, I haven waited really other result)

3.) I was getting started to re-apply my mods:
* re-applied the layout changes on the original section
* added my custom sections
* re-applied the layout on my three custom section
* took care of to use the same DD Item, to use the same labels and RV names, to apply the same geometry, to set the same section and RV properties.

4.) Here came the ERs using Visual ER Compare:
* I haven't any custom ER variable, so there was nothing to do with them
* I started first to move my ERs into my custom section using Visual ER Compare: after the first section the ER validation was successfull but weren't after the remaining two. The ER validation bombed me with a lot of error log...
...AND...
... the strange thing were that the log named another Section that hasn't been touched by me but are new after UPDATE2 and ESUs.

I switched on the "Show Object IDs" in View/User Options of Visual ER Compare and detected that two of my custom section has the same section ID than two of the new three section shipped by UPDATE2/ESUs.

Another strange thing was that the moved ERs appeared under the new sections instead of under mine customs when I opened the UBE with the designer (RDA).

Object IDs of the shipped new sections are:
128 for "Grand Total Processing"
129 for "Grand Total Heading"
130 for "Grand Total Detail"

Object IDs of my re-applied custom sections are:
127 for my first
128 for my second
130 for my third section

My first section was "fortunate" the to gain an ID in a gap but 128 and 130 IDs are in conflict.

I have had a lot of work up to now in this job re-applying my mods and I do not believe that the result will be different if I start it from scratch again. Further starting from scratch requires to re-apply UPDATE2 and maybe some ESUs for this UBEtoo but our CNC guys have currently a bunch of other problems and other urgent job.

Please, help!!!

Any solution will be highly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,

Again: this happens on XE SP 15.1, SQL+NTs

Zoltán
... with a bit more gray hair

B7332 SP11, ESU 4116422, Intel NT4, SQL 7 SP1
(working with B7321, B7331, XE too)

Hi List/Forum,

I will detail my current situation but I suppose it is not special for =
the
UBE/UPDATE2/ESUs but could be general problem.
I really-really hope that somebody could help because this issue drives=
me
crazy. Let's see.

First of all: this happens on XE SP 15.1, SQL+NTs

1.) I made more mods on R12855 User Defined Depreciation UBE, like:
* extended the layout of an existing section
* created three custom section (all are Conditional, hmmm... alias "Pag=
e
Break After" on our SP15.1, see the thread: Do Custom Section)
* added event rule parts to existing event rules of existing sections (=
as
less as was necessary)
* added event rules to my new sections (all in Do Section)

2.) We applied UPDATE2 and some ESUs
* Although our CNC guys said it happened with MERGE, all of my mods wer=
e
wiped out (no problem, I haven waited really other result)

3.) I was getting started to re-apply my mods:
* re-applied the layout changes on the original section
* added my custom sections
* re-applied the layout on my three custom section
* took care of to use the same DD Item, to use the same labels and RV
names, to apply the same geometry, to set the same section and RV
properties.

4.) Here came the ERs using Visual ER Compare:
* I haven't any custom ER variable, so there was nothing to do with the=
m
* I started first to move my ERs into my custom section using Visual ER=

Compare: after the first section the ER validation was successfull but
weren't after the remaining two. The ER validation bombed me with a lot=
of
error log...
...AND...
... the strange thing were that the log named another Section that hasn=
't
been touched by me but are new after UPDATE2 and ESUs.

I switched on the "Show Object IDs" in View/User Options of Visual ER
Compare and detected that two of my custom section has the same section=
ID
than two of the new three section shipped by UPDATE2/ESUs.

Another strange thing was that the moved ERs appeared under the new
sections instead of under mine customs when I opened the UBE with the
designer (RDA).

Object IDs of the shipped new sections are:
128 for "Grand Total Processing"
129 for "Grand Total Heading"
130 for "Grand Total Detail"

Object IDs of my re-applied custom sections are:
127 for my first
128 for my second
130 for my third section

My first section was "fortunate" the to gain an ID in a gap but 128 and=
130
IDs are in conflict.

I have had a lot of work up to now in this job re-applying my mods and =
I do
not believe that the result will be different if I start it from scratc=
h
again. Further starting from scratch requires to re-apply UPDATE2 and m=
aybe
some ESUs for this UBEtoo but our CNC guys have currently a bunch of ot=
her
problems and other urgent job.

Please, help!!!

Any solution will be highly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,

Again: this happens on XE SP 15.1, SQL+NTs

Zolt=E1n
... with a bit more gray hair

B7332 SP11, ESU 4116422, Intel NT4, SQL 7 SP1
(working with B7321, B7331, XE too)
--------------------------
Visit the forum to view this thread at:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=3D&Board=3DOW=
DEV&Numb
er=3D23609
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
This is the JDEList One World=AE / XE Developers mailing list / foru=
m.
Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
UNSUBSCRIBE can be found on the JDEList Forum at
http://www.JDEList.com

JDEList is not affiliated with JDEdwards=AE

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+




=

Zoltan,
Would it be possible for you to change the
original section name of your mods to something
different and then create the same section in Update
2. I guess that would make sure that the name does not
match with the Update 2 mods and you would be able to
ER compare the sections

Hope this helps
Yathindra
--- Zoltan_Gyimesi <[email protected]> wrote:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=OWDEV&Number=23609
-+


=====
Yathindra
One World XE SP 13
Win NT AS/400

__________________________________________________

Yathindra,

Thanks for your reply.
Digging a bit deeper in the issue I have found that there is two little field for Object IDs on the bottom. I detected that the Section IDs were correct but were not the section IDs of the "Do Section" event of my new sections. E.g. the Section ID is 128 in the old UBE and is 131 in the UPDATE2-ed UBE for one of my section but when you select its "Do Section" event in the tree then the Section ID is 128 in both UBE!
I have opened a call with response line, sent them a step by step screenshots fully with comments and explanation. Currently I am waiting and waiting patiently for their reply.

Regards,
Zoltán
P.S.: I have already tried to rename the sections as you suggested but it doesn't helped.

B7332 SP11, ESU 4116422, Intel NT4, SQL 7 SP1
(working with B7321, B7331, XE too)