Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Best practice custom UBE.

  1. #1

    Best practice custom UBE.

    Hello group.
    We are upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 and we have couple custom UBEs e.g R56xxxx.

    We brought those successfully to our new environment.
    Now question is do you just keep using those in new environments or compare with new original JDE object and add all new changes to it. ?
    Ad

    E9.1.2
    T9.1.2.3

  2. #2
    Senior Member DSauve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,262
    It depends. If the UBE is completely custom, then it should be good to run, as long as the underlying database and any other called objects are the same.

    If the UBE was a copy of a JDE-supplied UBE, then it may be worthwhile to take a new copy and then reapply and test your customizations.

    Either way, be sure to test thoroughly!
    Don Sauve
    Wagstaff, Inc.
    E1 9.2, Win2016, SQL Server 2016, TR 9.2.2.6, WebLogic 12.2.1, BI Publisher

  3. #3
    Don
    Thanks yes they are copied from JDE supplied object.
    I think I should go that route you mentioned.
    Other question , I can compare ER but is there a way to compare Template ?
    Thanks in advance.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by adeel View Post
    Don
    Thanks yes they are copied from JDE supplied object.
    I think I should go that route you mentioned.
    Other question , I can compare ER but is there a way to compare Template ?
    Thanks in advance.
    9.2.4 tools allows compare/merge of several object types - see https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E53430_01...s.htm#EOTSU141
    ... but PO templates not one of them (although there is a Processing Option Compare that may do what you want)...
    Contract JD Edwards Development Consultant.
    EnterpriseOne Xe through 9.2. Windows/Unix/OS400. SQLServer/Oracle/DB2 for i.
    ER, C/C++, BI Publisher, SQL, DSI dcLink

  5. #5
    Thanks Jolly
    I will take a look.

  6. #6
    Yes I looked the RDA compare tool, it only works for me to compare with .par. the object lib compare not working. so download par files and compare.
    Also there is no report to print the comparison so I have take screen shots . But overall pretty cool!
    i still thinking don't change to customization as there are no new CRUD operation JDE object and take original copy and redo my work will be time consuming.
    Ad

    E9.1.2
    T9.1.2.3

  7. #7
    If the customised UBE are brought and they run fine and the results are validated by your business end to end , then no need to do anything and no need to copy from new vanilla and again customise or retrofit . If anything is requested for future , then you can ask business to run the vanilla and see if that does what they want and then may be retrofit then .

  8. #8
    Thanks JDE
    Agree with you unless there is new tables introduced etc
    Ad

    E9.1.2
    T9.1.2.3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The legal restrictions and terms of use applicable to this site are available here.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
JDELIST is NOT affiliated with JD Edwards® & Company, Oracle or Peoplesoft. Contents of this site are neither endorsed nor approved by JD Edwards® & Company and, or Oracle.