GerClaassen
Member
We have a problem with financial reports, creating JE´s.
At the moment we are implementing Oneworld XE and uptil now World-software is used.
We are now developing financial reports in OW, based on the FASTR-definitions.
A functionality which is very often used, is the creation of journal entries.
In Financial Report Writer, we use the smart field FINRPTJE and in the definition of this smart field we define that the 'subsequent business unit" ( on tab JE report result BU) should be retreived as part of the account number in the JE. (with definition *S)
When running the report, there are indeed JE's created, however, with the wrong MCU in the account number.
Our definition of the "subsequent business unit" is that the value of the field MCUS in F0006 should be retrieved from the BSVW Business Unit.
This is also how FASTR in World-software functions.
However, the interpretation of "subsequent business unit"of JDE in OW is different and in our opinion wrong.
As also described in KG document OFN-02-0077, the 'subsequent business unit" is retrieved from the next record read in the report.
This makes no sense at all.
Has anyone encountered the same issue; strange enough we cannot find any issues on JDE´s KG.[wink]
At the moment we are implementing Oneworld XE and uptil now World-software is used.
We are now developing financial reports in OW, based on the FASTR-definitions.
A functionality which is very often used, is the creation of journal entries.
In Financial Report Writer, we use the smart field FINRPTJE and in the definition of this smart field we define that the 'subsequent business unit" ( on tab JE report result BU) should be retreived as part of the account number in the JE. (with definition *S)
When running the report, there are indeed JE's created, however, with the wrong MCU in the account number.
Our definition of the "subsequent business unit" is that the value of the field MCUS in F0006 should be retrieved from the BSVW Business Unit.
This is also how FASTR in World-software functions.
However, the interpretation of "subsequent business unit"of JDE in OW is different and in our opinion wrong.
As also described in KG document OFN-02-0077, the 'subsequent business unit" is retrieved from the next record read in the report.
This makes no sense at all.
Has anyone encountered the same issue; strange enough we cannot find any issues on JDE´s KG.[wink]
