HDdresser
Member
We are using robot to call a CL that executes the RUNUBE command which seems to work fine. In the robot job we have 6 CL's that the single robot job would call in the order of there scheduled run. (see the example below)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R4252007)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R554256503)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R1702401)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R550000402)
SBMJOB CMD(CALL PGM(JDECSTM/CLDELRECPT))
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R4280004)
Example of the first RUNUBE CL...........................
RUNUBE USER(XXXXXXXXX) PASSWORD(XXXXXX) +
ENVIRON(JPD811) ROLE(*ALL) REPORT(R42520) +
VERSION(JBP007) JOBQ(DSTJOBQ) IORB(B)
..........................................................
all of these jobs are submitted to tho the same single threaded jobq the problem is that ocasionally the 2nd and 3rd job in the stream will not run. We look in JDE and there is no record of it running, we also look at the Iseries job log at there is no log of the job ever being submitted but we can see jobs 1,4,5 and 6 were submitted. Has anyone experience the same issue when executing multiple RUNUBE's. I'm thinking of setting up a robot job for each individual job but I really would rather not do it that way ?????
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R4252007)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R554256503)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R1702401)
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R550000402)
SBMJOB CMD(CALL PGM(JDECSTM/CLDELRECPT))
CALL PGM(JDECSTM/R4280004)
Example of the first RUNUBE CL...........................
RUNUBE USER(XXXXXXXXX) PASSWORD(XXXXXX) +
ENVIRON(JPD811) ROLE(*ALL) REPORT(R42520) +
VERSION(JBP007) JOBQ(DSTJOBQ) IORB(B)
..........................................................
all of these jobs are submitted to tho the same single threaded jobq the problem is that ocasionally the 2nd and 3rd job in the stream will not run. We look in JDE and there is no record of it running, we also look at the Iseries job log at there is no log of the job ever being submitted but we can see jobs 1,4,5 and 6 were submitted. Has anyone experience the same issue when executing multiple RUNUBE's. I'm thinking of setting up a robot job for each individual job but I really would rather not do it that way ?????