Radjammin2
Active Member
Ok these things really slow down client package installations. Now I read I can just rename the client folders and they won't attempt to install and I also see I can remove reference on my deployement server but then they are probaby there for a reason.
I understand that without BPMBroker, I wouldn't be able to Event debug and then with process modeler I assume functionals couldn't use process models. What do you guys do?
Is it worth it to just rename the folders on non-developer pcs? Or should I just edit my deployment server. I guess I really can't remove debugging functionaltiy, unless is there an easy way to update this item when I need it per workstation? But if I have to do it on the developer workstations after every update? or full? maybe the rename thing is better. I am guess I am just asking for opionions.
Thanks in advance.
I understand that without BPMBroker, I wouldn't be able to Event debug and then with process modeler I assume functionals couldn't use process models. What do you guys do?
Is it worth it to just rename the folders on non-developer pcs? Or should I just edit my deployment server. I guess I really can't remove debugging functionaltiy, unless is there an easy way to update this item when I need it per workstation? But if I have to do it on the developer workstations after every update? or full? maybe the rename thing is better. I am guess I am just asking for opionions.
Thanks in advance.
