Re: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

[b_gilmore]

Re: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

What can we do as users of this software?

Is there any benefit to reporting an issue that has already been reported by
another JDE client? It seems they just tack the client name to the existing
SAR. Does this sway their priorities?


gbjde <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just look at the service pack issues. Instead of
> releasing a service pack every other week, how about
> getting one right. Ed McVaney said that Autopilot
> would be used to test development objects before they
> go out the door, that is obviously not happening.
> Also, they are now firing account execs. for not
> meeting their quotas, why don't they fire the QA
> person responsible for some of these issues. Maybe
> the sales people would have an easier sell.
> --- david mallory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail
> > reader does not understand
> > this format, some or all of this message may not be
> > legible.
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A361.B9E2D620
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > I think your take is about right. There will be no
> > stability anytime soon.
> > With OW, just because "it is the next release" does
> > not mean it is more
> > stable. We have seen that.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------
> > To view this thread, visit the JDEList forum at:
> >
>
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=0&Board=OW&Number=6596
> >
> >
> *************************************************************
> > This is the JDEList One World / XE Mailing List.
> > Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
> > UNSUBSCRIBE can be found at http://www.JDELIST.com
> >
> *************************************************************
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> To view this thread, visit the JDEList forum at:
>
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=0&Board=OW&Number=6627

> *************************************************************
> This is the JDEList One World / XE Mailing List.
> Archives and information on how to SUBSCRIBE, and
> UNSUBSCRIBE can be found at http://www.JDELIST.com
> *************************************************************


____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1

 

[Chad_Anderson]

Re: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

I love a good JD Edwards bashing every now and then. They come up with all these new marketing slogans, XE, c-commerce. But they still have to remember that all the marketing in the world can't fix all the software bugs they have. Why don't they try to work on a new version called "QA". Then again if the software didn't have bugs in it we would all probably be out of a job.

Good job ed, keep up the bad work!!

P.S. For all the old listers out there, didn't I read once that there was only 1 QA tester?

Chad Anderson
Generac Portable Products L.L.C.
B733.1 SP 7.1 AS400 Ent NT SQL Deploy

 

[altquark]

Re: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

Yes

and he got cut last year at layoff time

I think they decided they couldn't afford all the bananas......

(referencing the librarian of Unseen University, Ankh Morpok.....)


ERP Sourcing
http://www.erpsourcing.com
[email protected]

 

[altquark]

Re: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

an ape reference - not a monkey reference at all

honestly



ERP Sourcing
http://www.erpsourcing.com
[email protected]

 

[DBohner-(db)]

RE: [RE: Xe Quality Control]

It was once written that 100 monkeys banging on seventy-five keyboards for
twenty three hours a day seven daze a week could come up with equivelent
working JDE code in eighteen years.

If that is true, do we want to wait another twelve to fifteen years for the
technology JDE is providing today?

[email protected]
www.existinglight.net