lespin
Member
Re: Re[2]: Session Control
The big deal is that we only have 25 licenses and over 35 users.
Licensing go for about 3K a pop, so I have to limit the ones I have.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ahenry" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Session Control
What's the big deal?
What's the reason for not wanting them to have a second sign on?
If it is so that they don't run two interactive jobs at the same time, then
using sysreq is not a problem as only one session is active at one time.
The
other session gets suspended.
It doesn't use up more resources.
--------------------------
The big deal is that we only have 25 licenses and over 35 users.
Licensing go for about 3K a pop, so I have to limit the ones I have.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ahenry" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Session Control
What's the big deal?
What's the reason for not wanting them to have a second sign on?
If it is so that they don't run two interactive jobs at the same time, then
using sysreq is not a problem as only one session is active at one time.
The
other session gets suspended.
It doesn't use up more resources.
--------------------------