SteveC
Member
I`ve got a couple of F3111 records which just don`t look right to me, and Im thinking that I need to write an integrity to fix them. But before I do, I`d like some clarification that my analysis is correct....
Take a look at the attachment. It shows the results of a query on the F3111 for a specific component/lot/location.
On the first line, you can see that the component line is unissued, but a lot is (hard) allocated - but WMQNTA is zero - shouldn`t it be the same value as WMUORG?
On the 2nd line, we have issued the full quantity required, but WMQNTA = original quantity required - shouldn`t it be zero??
As I understand it, R3190 WO Repost reads WMQNTA in order to repost the F41021 allocations, so thats never going to fix this issue - i need to somehow "repost" the F3111 quantities.
Could someone confirm my assumptions are correct, or otherwise? I`d also like to know what processes are responsible for populating / updating WMQNTA
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:: The above must be completeley wrong - because now 2 more WO`s have had this lot/location added to them and the commitment is correct (see 2nd attachment).
It feels like theres a business function or functions which are updating F41021 at the point of hard allocation (either through P3111 or R31410) and when the 2 new WO`s were allocated, they "reset" the allocation on F41021.
Now, you can see the 2 original F3111 records are unchanged, so what gives?
Take a look at the attachment. It shows the results of a query on the F3111 for a specific component/lot/location.
On the first line, you can see that the component line is unissued, but a lot is (hard) allocated - but WMQNTA is zero - shouldn`t it be the same value as WMUORG?
On the 2nd line, we have issued the full quantity required, but WMQNTA = original quantity required - shouldn`t it be zero??
As I understand it, R3190 WO Repost reads WMQNTA in order to repost the F41021 allocations, so thats never going to fix this issue - i need to somehow "repost" the F3111 quantities.
Could someone confirm my assumptions are correct, or otherwise? I`d also like to know what processes are responsible for populating / updating WMQNTA
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:: The above must be completeley wrong - because now 2 more WO`s have had this lot/location added to them and the commitment is correct (see 2nd attachment).
It feels like theres a business function or functions which are updating F41021 at the point of hard allocation (either through P3111 or R31410) and when the 2 new WO`s were allocated, they "reset" the allocation on F41021.
Now, you can see the 2 original F3111 records are unchanged, so what gives?