ekempter
Administrator
What is the downside to running Co-Existence with XE at World 7.3.10?
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
Kevin_McAlexand
Active Member
None if you load the required PTF that loads the CUM 12 objects
needed for coexistence.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Co-Existence @ CUM10
Author: [email protected] at INTERNET
Date: 4/18/01 5:44 PM
What is the downside to running Co-Existence with XE at World 7.3.10?
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
--------------------------
Visit the forum to view this thread at:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=OW&Number=9362
needed for coexistence.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Co-Existence @ CUM10
Author: [email protected] at INTERNET
Date: 4/18/01 5:44 PM
What is the downside to running Co-Existence with XE at World 7.3.10?
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
--------------------------
Visit the forum to view this thread at:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=OW&Number=9362
CHo
VIP Member
You need to apply the Y2K CUMs separately.
B7322 OW Coexistance
Sandbox: Xe with SP 15, CO on SQL
Catherine Ho
Programmer/Analyst
Dundee Realty
Toronto, ON
Canada
416-365-5999 ext. 8805
What is the downside to running Co-Existence with XE at World 7.3.10?
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
--------------------------
Visit the forum to view this thread at:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=OW&Number=9362
C Ho
Intermediate Programmer/Analyst
B7322 SP 12.4
AS/400 coexistant with SQL Server 7.0
Sandbox: Xe AS/400 coexistant with CO on SQL 7.0
B7322 OW Coexistance
Sandbox: Xe with SP 15, CO on SQL
Catherine Ho
Programmer/Analyst
Dundee Realty
Toronto, ON
Canada
416-365-5999 ext. 8805
What is the downside to running Co-Existence with XE at World 7.3.10?
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
--------------------------
Visit the forum to view this thread at:
http://198.144.193.139/cgi-bin/wwwthreads/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=OW&Number=9362
C Ho
Intermediate Programmer/Analyst
B7322 SP 12.4
AS/400 coexistant with SQL Server 7.0
Sandbox: Xe AS/400 coexistant with CO on SQL 7.0
ekempter
Administrator
What Y2K CUMs? Like everyone, we had to apply a bunch of Y2K SARs and Updates 1 and 2. Are there more???
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
Place your system configuration information in your signature!
Birddog
Member
We are CUM 11 and will be applying CUM12.
The reasons we decided to go ahead with CUM12 are:
1. It is recommened by JDE and if something does go wrong and you are not at the recommended release theey can be very standoffish on support calls.
2. In addition you must apply PTFS X1 through X3 for co-existance if you are not at CUM12 there is an additional CUM to apply, the number excapes me at the moment.
We figured we just might as well do CUM12 X1, X2, X3 as remain on CUM11 apply the special one, plus X1, X2, X3.
We are in the process of setting up for co-existance, so this will not be our final configuration, but following is what we have so far:
Deployment Server- Compaq running WIN2000. Central Objects located here.
Enterprise Server- AS400 at CUM12 with X3. V4R5 The machine is a 620 114 CPW- TEST.
Web Server- AS400 Websphere 3.5.3 V4R5 The machine is a 740 480CPW per CPU. The TEST LPAR has 2 CPU.
Our development clients are Thinkpads with WIN2000, about 40 gig, 800 MHZ with 256RAM.
If all goes well we will deploy to our production AS400 machines which are partitioned 830/840s.
The reasons we decided to go ahead with CUM12 are:
1. It is recommened by JDE and if something does go wrong and you are not at the recommended release theey can be very standoffish on support calls.
2. In addition you must apply PTFS X1 through X3 for co-existance if you are not at CUM12 there is an additional CUM to apply, the number excapes me at the moment.
We figured we just might as well do CUM12 X1, X2, X3 as remain on CUM11 apply the special one, plus X1, X2, X3.
We are in the process of setting up for co-existance, so this will not be our final configuration, but following is what we have so far:
Deployment Server- Compaq running WIN2000. Central Objects located here.
Enterprise Server- AS400 at CUM12 with X3. V4R5 The machine is a 620 114 CPW- TEST.
Web Server- AS400 Websphere 3.5.3 V4R5 The machine is a 740 480CPW per CPU. The TEST LPAR has 2 CPU.
Our development clients are Thinkpads with WIN2000, about 40 gig, 800 MHZ with 256RAM.
If all goes well we will deploy to our production AS400 machines which are partitioned 830/840s.
