wadie
Well Known Member
Hi list,
I'm working on a Position/Requisition program and I was asked to design it this way that a position in UK can replace a position in France. The problem is that, due to restricitions, UK people can't see the list of positions in France and thus can't select it.
This wasn't a real problem since my analyst believed that they would know the position number anyway.
The pickle in this situation is that we are currently performing a check on the field to see whether it's an exisiting position or not (since one can't replace a non-existing position)
But because of security in F00950 the check can't find the position either.
Is there a way to avoid the security in F00950? Do a select with a different user,... ? I don't think anything will be changed in the security records of F00950 so I am looking for another way.
I've been looking around but everything I try depends on the user I'm using and that's the part that doesn't get clearance
I'm working on a Position/Requisition program and I was asked to design it this way that a position in UK can replace a position in France. The problem is that, due to restricitions, UK people can't see the list of positions in France and thus can't select it.
This wasn't a real problem since my analyst believed that they would know the position number anyway.
The pickle in this situation is that we are currently performing a check on the field to see whether it's an exisiting position or not (since one can't replace a non-existing position)
But because of security in F00950 the check can't find the position either.
Is there a way to avoid the security in F00950? Do a select with a different user,... ? I don't think anything will be changed in the security records of F00950 so I am looking for another way.
I've been looking around but everything I try depends on the user I'm using and that's the part that doesn't get clearance